Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Final week and counting

Hello everyone... Welcome to the final blog, or will it be?? Nope, I will continue to blog on this site periodically. I would love to thank our professors for showing us and giving us the opportunity to learn about and have a blog. I think that this is one of the unsung heroes of this course. I mean... we are moving forward in technology. It will be just like the new movie with Denzel and we will be able to insript things under our skin, have flying cars etc... or maybe like the movie "I'Robot" where robots do everything. So teaching us how to communicate through blogs is something I value a lot with this course. I am also very pleased to be collecting data on my action research plan and hope to make drastic changes with the help of the results I'm thinking it will bring forward. Til later thank you everyone for commenting on my blog and being a part of this course. Let the DATA DRIVE

Monday, February 13, 2012

Measurable?

Through the latest week I've began to wonder... Is my project measurable? I think I'm scaring myself off more than anything so I am going to continue to proceed. Plus it's what is happening right now. With us moving toward the STAAR test Rigor is something that we absolutely have to amp up. Our students have to be able to solve multiple step objective problems. So my concern is something that I am going to overlook. Throughout meeting with my principal and the math specialist they have insisted that I push forwrd. This does ease my concerns some.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Mathematics and The Rigor

Action Planning Template

Goal: To increase student achievement through implementing more rigorous curriculum in Mathematics.

Action Steps(s): 

Person(s) Responsible: 

Timeline: Start/End 

Needed Resources 

Evaluation 

Step 2 Examining the Work

Gather the sample size

2nd grade team, math interventionist

8-11 through

4-12

Teacher rosters

Students scores within spread sheets

Step 2 Examining the Work

Gather the data based on students achievement

2nd grade team, math interventionist

2-12 through 5-12

Students scores on BOY,MOY,EOY Kathy Richardson

Scores on Common assessments

Start graphing what students are where

Step 2 Examining the work Organize the curriculum that was implemented by each teacher

2nd grade team, math interventionist

4-12 through 8-12

All curriculum used within school year

What was successful

Step 3 Examining the work: Developing Deeper Understanding

Find all second students from previous years and color mark them

2nd grade team, math interventionist, 3rd grade team

8-12through

9-12

Teacher Rosters from 2011-12 and 2012-13

 

Track students progress based on any common assessments given in math

2nd grade team, math interventionist, 3rd grade team

8-12 through 12-12 

Scores from common assessments or math benchmarks 

Look at what students were successful and what classroom they came from in 2nd grade

Step 4

Examining the Work 

Kyle Hatcher 

Summer 2012 

Looking at what teachers have gone to what professional development 


 


 


 

Step 4 Examining the work 

Kyle Hatcher 

Summer 2012-

8-12 

Creating a Power Point Presentation with scores related to professional development 

How did 2nd graders do on end of year benchmark, after teachers had time to implement instruction

Step 5

Examining the Work exploring Programmatic Patterns 

Kyle Hatcher

Summer 2012-

8-12 

Notes on where the bias of the experiment lay. Make sure students are evenly dispersed accordingly to ability 

Discussion group with Math interventionist

Step 6

Examining the Work 

Kyle Hatcher, Carrie Layton, Leslie Koskie 

8-12 through 10-12

Decide what is worked out to be best practices 

Discussion with math interventionist

Step 6

Examining the Work  

Kyle Hatcher, Carrie Layton, Leslie Koskie 

Fall 2012 

Look at Students 3rd grade scores

Track their progress 

Step 7 Examining the Work

Kyle Hatcher 

Fall 2012 

Present Findings via presentation 

Identify what best practices worked within the school 

Step 8 Sustaining improvement 

Kyle Hatcher 

Fall 2012 

Survey 3rd grade students too see how they best learned mathematics

 

Action Research Plan

Hello all and welcome to another stressful week..... A thorwing up baby, family, self..... what a 7 days. But it has been a interesting 7 days with a lot of learning. We started our Action Research Plans. I decided to stray away from classroom management. I found that there may just be too many things that might effect that. So I have decided to track the progress of our students taught by different teachers. Specifically 2nd graders and how they are being taught and how that will effect them in their growth. Here are the details Tell Me whatcha think!!!!!
The Action Research Plan is something that has hit home with me because I am actually living what I am going to be researching. Here at Ginnings, we are going to do a action research plan where we look at the teachers in 2nd grade and their math scores. We aren’t just looking at scores we are looking at each individual classroom and the amount of rigor that is taught in mathematics. With the STAAR test changing and upping in rigor we have found that math is going to become multiple steps. Before on standardized tests in Texas you might have seen a test question that hit on one TEK or objective. Now we are looking at seeing a question that will hit multiple TEKS. With that being said we are going to look at the scores of the students who are in a more rigorous environment versus those who who are still being taught with one step objective math problems.
Since we are heavily into PLC’s this will help facilitate more rigor throughout the school. By sharing what we are doing that is the foundation of a great PLC. We will use the data to look at the common assessment scores as well as the benchmark scores of the individual students in each classroom to see what strategies are helping them the best, not only in 2nd grade, but 3rd grade also.
To support the statements or findings that we will come up with we will use the scores of the children. As well as the curriculum that each teacher uses and what curriculum is used. We are going to also go through the curriculum and with the math interventionist decide which is more rigorous. Thus will give us a idea of which children fall into which category.
As we conclude on our action plan by December of next year we hope to have a idea that those that are being taught at a more rigorous, multiple step level are the more successful students. However, Im sure that some questions will arrive such as can we not just “drill and kill?” or we are “teaching the curriculum we are given.” Or “I am teaching the TEK.” However, the best practices are whats best for students. I’m hopeful this research will show that.